Header
Blog


Friday, January 11th, 2008

Corus Chess Tournament 2008 Preview

The Corus Chess Tournament in Wijk Ann Zee starts tomorrow and the field is extremely strong this year. There are a few players who I’d love to see in the tournament who are absent this year, but it’s tough to fit everyone into a single tournament. The players who I was hoping to see play this year, but who are missing include Morozevich, Kamsky, and Shirov. All 3 of these players have been on a roll lately, but maybe the World Cup took too much out of Kamsky and Shirov, who knows. Here is the complete list of the Corus A group:

GM Viswanathan Anand IND 2799
GM Vladimir Kramnik RUS 2799
GM Veselin Topalov BUL 2780
GM Shakhryar Mamedyarov AZE 2760
GM Peter Leko HUN 2753
GM Vassily Ivanchuk UKR 2751
GM Levon Aronian ARM 2739
GM Boris Gelfand ISR 2737
GM Teymour Radjabov AZE 2735
GM Magnus Carlsen NOR 2733
GM Michael Adams ENG 2726
GM Judit Polgar HUN 2707
GM Pavel Eljanov UKR 2692
GM Loek van Wely NED 2681

It’s amazing how many strong GMs there are nowadays. The latest FIDE list includes 24 players over 2700! It makes you wonder if there has been some rating inflation over the past 5 years or so, or is it just easier to get to the 2700+ level? I have a theory that the ever increasing strength of computers makes it easier for a player to improve on his own. Secrets that were only known to a select few are now readily available to any player who uses a computer. You can basically analyze opening lines out to the very end, and even if you aren’t that talented at chess you can reach a very high level just memorizing stuff.

Mark Dvoretsky wrote a whole column on chesscafe.com where he says that chess is just becoming a game of memorization and home preparation. The top GMs tend to play the openings that are in fashion, and analyze them to the very end. Then when it’s clear there are no improvements left in that specific line, the GMs move on to something else. Chess is becoming a scorched earth game, and eventually there will be absolutely no room left for innovation.

Many people have advocated Fischer Random/Chess 960 as a possible solution to this problem, but Dvortesky seems to be firmly against it. Instead he suggests that the game starts with a few pawn moves already played, for instance if d3 and b6 were thrown in, it would change all the opening theory. I’m not quite sure I like this approach better than Chess 960, but I will give him credit for being original.

Oh and lastly, I want to wish US Women’s Champion, Irina Krush, good luck in the Corus C Group. I will be watching her games closely as I’m very interested to see how she’ll fare in a tournament of this strength.. Daily reports of the Corus Games will be coming, so stay tuned!


Comments



  • Well, Mark’s idea (yeah, we’re on a first-name basis, lol) is not so original; draughts (aka, checkers) has long used a drawing of opening setups to start competitive games. Definitely looking forward to this event though! 7:30 AM in our neck of the woods.

    Posted by: Erin at January 12th, 2008 at 12:36 am


  • Really? I didn’t know they did that in checkers. Perhaps this might be a good idea for chess then! 7:30 AM is really early I’ll be missing most of the Chess.FM commentary :(

    Posted by: Braden Bournival at January 12th, 2008 at 6:33 pm


  • Dvoretsky’s article was very interesting.

    However Dvoretsky was wrong to say that grandmasters would never get better at playing the early opening phase of FRC-chess960, even if FRC became a portion of their major annual tournaments.
    Necessity is the mother of invention. There are deep and beautiful principles of FRC openings just waiting to be discovered.

    In fact, in my FRC-chess960 book I showed that many of Reuben Fine’s 9 so-called “opening principles of chess” are not principles of chess in general at all; instead some are merely esoteric tactical truths about that one start position. Fine’s best principles are those that apply well to most or all of the chess960 start positions.

    (Search Amazon.com for “chess960″.)

    Dvoretsky’s other incorrect statement was that high quality chess cannot occur without deeply planned opening moves. He is wrong about that.
    Traditional “chess1″ may give us “profound” opening play, but it is badly tainted by extreme repetition among games.

    Is an exceptionally funny joke still funny after you have heard it ten times?
    Is the opening phase of the Sicilian Defense still fresh and entertaining after you have seen it dozens of times?

    Levon Aronian makes an annual August habit of finding clever moves in the very early going of FRC-chess960 games in Mainz Germany (ChessTigers.de), regardless of whether Dvoretsky is aware of that or not.

    Dvoretsky’s idea of rolling dice to make the first 2-4 plies of the game is interesting but flawed. Only symmetrical opening moves would be tolerable.

    Thanks.

    http://CastleLong.com …for FRC-chess960

    Posted by: GeneM at January 27th, 2008 at 3:34 am

Post a Comment